jevbooks

← All projects

compare-IA-decision

laurentvv/compare-IA-decision

Benchmark harness comparing local System One decision models via llama.cpp.

Evaluation & Benchmarking0.98Runner-up: Scoring & RankingCheck-up
Automated README summary

Automatically summarized from the README on 9 Oct 2026; not a run by jevbooks. Run instructions and author-reported outcomes still need verification.

What it is

A Python benchmark harness for comparing local System One decision models (julia-1, laya, lev, kev-0.8b, kev-4b, openjev) served by llama.cpp's POST /v1/systemone endpoint, using jev-style metrics on typed-decision suites.

How it uses Jev

Jev-style decision models read a state and answer typed questions (choice, score, noul) with probability distributions in one forward pass. The harness sends these questions to the endpoint, compares returned distributions against gold distributions, and computes calibration and accuracy metrics.

Primitives:choicescorenoul

Technique worth stealing

Matched-weights rule: compare all models at Q8_0 quantization for fair benchmarking.

Try it

uv sync; uv run decision-bench run --suite fixture --mock

View on GitHub

Start using Jev: API key and your first request →

Model judgments from README excerpts

Project signals use repository metadata, an existing summary and the first 700 README characters, not the full project. “Not found” means not detected in that material; it does not establish absence. These are the original judgments with recorded models and dates, not source audits or run results.

Models & evaluation dates

Inclusion gate
jev-1.13.0
Project signals
jev-1.13.0
Category
jev-1.13.0
Pattern tags
jev-1.13.0

Evidence

These signals use repository metadata, an existing summary and at most 700 cleaned README characters. ≥ 0.60 means reported in that excerpt; ≤ 0.40 means not found there. The middle band is inconclusive. None is a source-code audit or a test result. The runnable-tool question excludes research experiments; the recommendation question asks for a learning shortlist, not a quality verdict.

  • Jev is core to the projectunclear0.45
  • Shows a System One patternnot found in the excerpt0.12
  • Describes handling uncertaintynot found in the excerpt0.04
  • Reports measured numbersnot found in the excerpt0.29
  • Is a runnable toolnot found in the excerpt0.13
  • Top-10 learning shortlist signalnot found in the excerpt0.18
  • Is a replica of the modelunclear0.42
  • Solves a common problem (0–2)score on a 0–2 scale0.99 / 2
  • About JevFound in material0.97
Signals
Jev is core to the project0.45Shows a System One pattern0.12Describes handling uncertainty0.04Reports measured numbers0.29Is a runnable tool0.13Top-10 learning shortlist signal0.18Is a replica of the model0.4200.51Solves a common problem (0–2)0.99 / 2012

no-judgment band (0.40–0.60)

Design patterns
Check-up0.7300.51

no-judgment band (0.40–0.60)

The Jev model and date for each judgment stage are listed above. Card written by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash from the README on 9 Oct 2026.